1. What Bible translations did John Calvin actually use?
Calvin lived from 1509–1564—long before the KJV (1611) and before the later “Textus Receptus” editions that KJV-Onlyists treat as perfect. He used a mix of translations and original-language texts.
a. Latin Vulgate
This was the standard Bible of Western Christianity for a thousand years. Calvin knew it thoroughly. He respected it but openly corrected it wherever the Hebrew or Greek differed.
A 4th-century Latin translation revised by Jerome. It contains many textual differences (variants) from the Hebrew Masoretic Text and from the Greek manuscripts that later formed the TR.
b. Erasmus’s Greek New Testament (1516, 1519, 1522, 1527, 1535)
Calvin used Erasmus frequently because it was the first widely printed Greek NT in Europe.
Erasmus compiled his text quickly from a handful of late medieval manuscripts. He filled in missing Greek verses by translating the Latin Vulgate back into Greek (e.g., Revelation 22:16–21).
It was full of variants, and Calvin knew these.
c. Robert Estienne’s (Stephanus’s) Greek New Testament (1546, 1549, 1550, 1551)
Calvin was in Geneva when Stephanus produced these editions. Calvin used them and discussed their variant readings.
The 1550 edition became the basis for later TR editions, including Beza’s and eventually the KJV translators. But in Calvin’s lifetime it was not considered perfect, inerrant, or final.
d. Beza’s Greek New Testament (beginning 1560)
Calvin worked closely with Beza in Geneva. Calvin used Beza’s early editions.
Beza’s text differs from Erasmus and Stephanus in hundreds of places.
e. French Bible translations
Calvin used Olivétan’s French Bible (1535), which he helped revise.
This translation differs from the Vulgate, from Erasmus, from Stephanus, and from modern translations.
f. Hebrew Old Testament
Calvin had strong Hebrew training and regularly used the Rabbinic textual traditions.
The Masoretic Text itself was not absolutely uniform at the time; Calvin often noted variant readings and uncertainties.
Calvin's interpretive approach was to be a linguistic scholar who worked from the original languages, a theologian who corrected the traditional Latin Vulgate, and a pastor who promoted the best vernacular translations like the Olivétan French Bible.
2. Did the translations and manuscripts Calvin used contain variants?
Yes—in abundance. The Greek texts Calvin used disagreed with each other. The Latin Vulgate disagreed with the Greek. The Hebrew manuscripts had variations in spelling, word division, and marginal notes.
Calvin frequently:
• compared readings
• rejected certain readings
• preferred others
• explained why some manuscripts were better
• acknowledged uncertainty in a number of passages
He treated textual variation as normal and expected.
3. Did Calvin believe in a “perfect Bible text”? Was he promoting a perfect Greek or Hebrew edition?
No. Calvin never claimed:
• a perfect Greek manuscript tradition
• a perfect printed edition
• a perfect translation
Calvin’s doctrine of Scripture affirmed infallibility and inspiration of the autographs—not perfection in any one manuscript or printed edition.
He explicitly acknowledged imperfections in the manuscript tradition.
Calvin: “It is well known that the manuscripts differ.”
Calvin's Actual Quotation (from his Commentary on the Catholic Epistles on 1 John 5:7):
“The whole of this verse has been by some omitted. Jerome thinks that this has happened through design rather than through mistake, and that indeed only on the part of the Latins. But as even the Greek copies do not agree, I dare not assert any thing on the subject.”
A man who believed in a perfect text would never say this.
4. What was Calvin’s view on Scripture, manuscripts, Hebrew, and Greek?
a. Scripture is perfect in its divine origin, not in any one manuscript
Calvin: Institutes 1.7.2
“Scripture obtains full authority among believers only when men regard it as having sprung from heaven, as if the living words of God themselves were spoken.”
His grounding of inerrancy is divine inspiration—not a perfect transmission.
He wrote: "Nothing, therefore, can be more absurd than the fiction, that the power of judging Scripture is in the Church, and that on her nod its certainty depends." (John Calvin and Henry Beveridge, Institutes of the Christian Religion, vol. 1 (Edinburgh: The Calvin Translation Society, 1845), 91.) As said by Calvin. Do you have the authority to judge the ESV and NIV? No!
b. Manuscripts contain human errors
Calvin repeatedly admits scribal mistakes.
Commenting on 1 Samuel 13:1:
"I confess I do not know what the meaning is, nor am I sure what the true reading ought to be... for the Hebrews are in the habit of counting according to the order of years, not according to the perfect years of the life of each individual. Perhaps, however, a number has been omitted by the fault of the scribes."
Calvin acknowledges problems in the text without panicking or inventing a doctrine of perfect preservation. He indeed confesses that he cannot determine the true meaning or the correct reading of the verse, acknowledging a potential scribal error or textual corruption in the Hebrew text. This confirms that he openly acknowledged the presence of scribal mistakes in the Old Testament manuscripts.
c. The Hebrew and Greek texts must be studied, compared, and corrected where needed
Calvin constantly corrects the Vulgate based on Hebrew and Greek, and sometimes corrects Greek based on better Greek manuscripts.
5. How did Calvin unite the church while multiple Bible translations existed?
He united the church by refusing to make one manuscript tradition or one translation the basis of Christian fellowship.
Calvin believed:
• all faithful translations are servants of the Word, not the Word itself
• textual variants do not destroy doctrine
• Christians can use different translations without suspicion
• unity is in doctrine, not in identical printed Bibles
Calvin: Preface to the French New Testament (1543)
“The Word of God must be accessible to all… translated into every tongue, so that all may hear and understand.”
This reflects John Calvin's passionate argument for vernacular translation of the Bible.
This idea is central to Calvin's theology and the broader Protestant Reformation. He strongly advocated against the Catholic Church's practice of restricting the Bible to Latin (the Vulgate) and denying it to the common people.
He argued that the Holy Spirit speaks to all, not just the educated elite.
He championed the principle that the Word of God should be made plain and common so that every person could read and understand the doctrine necessary for salvation, confirming the statement that "all may hear and understand."
His support for the French translation was a direct, practical application of the doctrine of Sola Scriptura (Scripture alone) and the priesthood of all believers, which necessitates that every Christian have direct access to the Bible in their native language ("translated into every tongue").
He did not say: “Use the exact same edition, word for word, or you are corrupting Scripture.”
Calvin saw translation diversity as a blessing, not a threat.
Calvin: Commentary on Psalm 19:7
He wrote: "...without the aid of the word, would profit us nothing, although it should be to us as a loud and distinct proclamation sounding in our ears..." God speaks to us in the Scriptures in a way suited to our weakness. That includes God’s willingness to speak through imperfect but faithful translations.
6. Summary: Why Calvin’s practice completely contradicts TR-perfectionism and KJV-Onlyism
Calvin used multiple Greek editions that disagreed.
He openly acknowledged textual variants and rejected some readings.
He never taught that one manuscript family or edition was perfect.
He never promoted a “received text” as later TR-advocates define it.
He believed the church could be united despite using different translations.
He grounded the authority of Scripture in inspiration, not in a perfect transmission.
Calvin’s theology, practice, and textual scholarship all contradict the modern claim that the Reformers believed in Perfect TR or a perfect vernacular translation.
If anything, Calvin stands as a witness against the modern movement that tries to freeze the Bible’s purity in one textual edition and exclude the rest of the church over it.
The Reformers trusted God’s Word deeply, but they never treated any translation or printed text as flawless. Their faith was in the God who speaks—not in a particular 16th-century printing press.
No comments:
Post a Comment