The relationship between verbal plenary inspiration and verbal plenary preservation represents a fundamental theological distinction that deserves careful attention.
The core problem with verbal plenary preservation is its false assumption that God’s inspiration of Scripture necessarily requires His divine preservation of every word ever written by scribes[1]. This conflates two separate theological claims: that God superintended the original composition and that He miraculously protected every subsequent copy from error.
Classical evangelical theology has long acknowledged this distinction, asserting infallibility “only for the original autographic text”[2]. The doctrine of verbal plenary inspiration concerns God’s work in the original writers—how He guided their selection of words to communicate His purposes. Inspiration means authors were guided to choose words corresponding with God’s Word, but these human words are not identical with God’s Word, since no human language can encompass divine reality[3].
Preservation, by contrast, addresses what happened after the autographs. The original manuscripts are lost, and variations in surviving copies seem inconsistent with the claim that literal inspiration required errorless preservation—especially since most Christians depend on translations for which infallible accuracy is not claimed[2]. While divine inspiration does entail preservation, God preserves the actual testimony of His herald as the medium of His continual self-disclosure in the community, not necessarily every scribal detail[3].
We suggest that verbal plenary inspiration can coherently stand without verbal plenary preservation. Inspiration addresses the origin of Scripture; preservation addresses its transmission. God can guarantee the reliability of the original message without guaranteeing flawless copying—a distinction that protects both the authority of Scripture and the integrity of textual criticism as a legitimate scholarly discipline.
[1] Got Questions Ministries, Got Questions? Bible Questions Answered (Bellingham, WA: Faithlife, 2014–2021). [See here.]
[2] Samuel Macauley Jackson, ed., in The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge (New York; London: Funk & Wagnalls, 1908–1914), 6:17–18.
[3] Donald G. Bloesch, Holy Scripture: Revelation, Inspiration & Interpretation (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1994), 121.
No comments:
Post a Comment