Sep 24, 2025

Bible verses and principles

1. God’s Word Is Not Limited to One Language

1 Corinthians 14:9 (NIV): "Unless you speak intelligible words with your tongue, how will anyone know what you are saying? You will just be speaking into the air."

Acts 2:6–11 — On Pentecost, the Spirit allowed people to hear the Word of God in their own languages. This shows God values accessibility in many tongues.

Revelation 7:9–10 — A great multitude from “every nation, tribe, people, and language” worship before the throne. The gospel is meant for all languages.

1 Timothy 2:3-4 (NIV): "This is good, and pleases God our Savior, who wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth."


2. Scripture Emphasizes Inspiration, Not Translation

2 Timothy 3:16–17 — “All Scripture is God-breathed…” (referring originally to the Hebrew and Greek writings, not specifically the KJV). The authority comes from God’s Word itself, not one English rendering.

2 Peter 1:20–21 — Prophecy came as men were moved by the Holy Spirit, again pointing to the originals rather than a single translation.


3. Translations Have Always Existed

Nehemiah 8:8 — Ezra and the Levites read from the Book of the Law of God, making it clear and giving the meaning so that the people could understand. That’s essentially translation and explanation.

Luke 4:18–19 (quoting Isaiah 61) — Jesus quoted the Septuagint (a Greek translation of Hebrew Scripture) rather than the Hebrew text word-for-word.


4. Avoid Division Over Non-Essentials

1 Corinthians 1:10–13 — Paul warns against dividing over leaders or human preferences. Similarly, dividing the church over which English Bible translation is “purest” causes unnecessary strife.

Romans 14:1–4 — Reminds us not to quarrel over disputable matters but to honor one another’s conscience before God.


5. The Goal of Scripture Is Understanding and Obedience

Psalm 119:105 — “Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path.” The purpose of Scripture is to guide us, not to be locked into one form.

John 17:17 — “Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth.” The truth of God’s Word is what sanctifies — not the English style of one translation.

Proverbs 30:5-6 (KJV): "Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him. Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar."


Practical Advice:

God never restricted His Word to one translation or one language.

The earliest Christians used different versions (Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic).

What matters most is understanding and obeying God’s Word, not defending one English rendering.

Galatians 6:1 (ESV): "Brothers, if anyone is caught in any transgression, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness."


Sep 23, 2025

Confessing Christ and the Danger of Division

Confessing Christ and the Danger of Division


To confess Christ is to love Him, to love His Word, and to love His people. True confession always walks hand in hand with humility and unity. But it is possible to speak boldly of Christ while at the same time denying Him in practice—by sowing unnecessary division in His body, the church.


Some insist that to be faithful to Christ one must hold to a very narrow view of Scripture—such as KJV-Onlyism, or the claim that God’s Word is only perfectly preserved in the Textus Receptus in a single, flawless form. While the love for Scripture behind such convictions is sincere, this position is not what Christ or His apostles require of us. Scripture itself never teaches that God’s Word is bound to one translation, one edition, or one text family. Instead, we are told: “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness” (2 Tim. 3:16).


The mark of true discipleship is not clinging to one edition of the Bible, but loving Christ and His people. Jesus said, “By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another” (John 13:35). If our defense of the Bible turns into a weapon that cuts the body of Christ, we have misunderstood both the Bible and the Savior it reveals.


To divide Christ’s church over a translation or a particular printed edition of Greek or Hebrew is to act contrary to the very Christ we claim to confess. To love Him is to build up His body, not fracture it. To confess Him is to proclaim His saving work, not add man-made requirements to His Word.


So let us hold fast to the inspired Scriptures with reverence, but let us also hold fast to one another in love. Christ is not honored by schisms dressed up as zeal. He is honored when His people confess Him with lips and lives marked by both truth and love.



Sep 22, 2025

Sermon

The preaching

that this world needs most

is sermons in shoes

that are walking with Jesus Christ.

- D.L. Moody

Against Lying By St. Augustine

Section 16. For there were even in the Apostles' times some who preached the truth not

16. For there were even in the Apostles' times some who preached the truth not in truth, that is, not with truthful mind: of whom the Apostle saith that they preached Christ not chastely, but of envy and strife. And on this account even at that time some were tolerated while preaching truth not with a chaste mind: yet not any have been praised as preaching falsehood with a chaste mind. Lastly, he saith of those, "Whether in pretence or in truth Christ be preached:" but in no wise would he say, In order that Christ may after be preached, let Him be first denied.


Translation:

Even back in the Apostles’ time, there were people who preached the message of Christ, but not with honest intentions. The Apostle said that some preached Christ out of jealousy and rivalry, not out of pure motives. Still, even then, such people were allowed to preach the truth, even though their hearts weren’t pure. But no one was ever praised for preaching lies, even if they did it with a good heart. In the end, the Apostle said, “Whether people preach Christ honestly or out of false motives, Christ is still being preached.” But he never said, “Let us deny Christ now so that later on Christ can be preached.”

Confessing Christ ?

The Dilemma

The tension arises because these convictions don’t perfectly overlap in history, theology, or textual transmission.


Confessing Christ vs. KJV-Onlyism

Confessing Christ is the central act of Christian faith (Romans 10:9–10).

KJV-Onlyism risks confusing confessing Christ with confessing a translation, which may add a layer of exclusivity not taught in Scripture.

Is my faith in Christ or in a particular English Bible?


Perfect TR vs. Historical Textual Reality

The TR itself went through multiple printed editions (Erasmus, Stephanus, Beza). They differ slightly. Which one is “perfect”?

Claiming “one perfect TR” doesn’t align neatly with historical evidence.

How do I reconcile belief in one perfect TR with the fact that no single TR edition is identical to the others?


Verbal Plenary Preservation vs. KJV-Onlyism

VPP is broader: God preserved His Word across all faithful manuscripts and copies, not necessarily in one translation.

KJV-Only claims preservation culminates only in the English KJV.

Does God’s promise of preservation mean one translation (KJV) or the faithful transmission of the text in Hebrew/Greek across manuscripts?


English Bible Exclusivity vs. Global Church

If the KJV alone is “perfect,” what about Christians in China, Africa, or South America who rely on translations from other textual traditions?

This raises questions about God’s faithfulness to preserve His Word for all nations and tongues (Revelation 7:9).

Is preservation limited to English-speaking believers?


The Conflicts Summarized

Faith in Christ vs. Elevating a Translation: The danger of confusing gospel confession with translation loyalty.


Perfect TR vs. Historical Editions: No single TR edition is universally agreed upon as “the one.”


Preservation vs. Translation: VPP refers to original-language texts, but KJV-Onlyism transfers that authority to a translation.


Universality vs. Exclusivity: Restricting God’s Word to one English version conflicts with the global, multi-lingual mission of the gospel.


The dilemma is that confessing Christ is about allegiance to the living Word (Christ Himself), while KJV-Onlyism, Perfect TR, and VPP—though motivated by love for Scripture—can create conflicts when they elevate one edition or translation above the broader doctrine of God’s preservation and the sufficiency of the gospel.



Building church together ?

 Whose Church Are We Building?


When we speak about building a church, we must first be clear: it is not our church to build according to our own blueprint. Jesus Christ said plainly, “I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it” (Matthew 16:18). Notice carefully—it is His church, and He is the builder. If we attempt to build it by our own preferences, convictions, or traditions, we risk placing ourselves in the position of lord rather than submitting to the true Head of the church.


1. The Danger of Our Own Blueprint


We may be tempted to say:


“Only KJV will be used here.”


“We will uphold verbal plenary preservation.”


“We will base everything on the TR text.”


“We will practice total abstinence from alcohol.”


“We will reject all tongue-speaking.”


While some of these positions may reflect biblical convictions, if we make them the foundation of the church rather than Christ Himself, we are no longer building on the Rock. Paul warns: “For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ” (1 Corinthians 3:11).


The church is not defined by the version of Scripture we prefer, nor by the policies we set, but by Christ’s finished work and His living presence among His people.


2. Christ Is the Head, Not Us


Paul tells us, “And he is the head of the body, the church” (Colossians 1:18). When we decide the terms of who can join us based on our own chosen distinctives, we risk dethroning Christ and enthroning ourselves. Instead, God’s Word shows the church is made up of all who are born again by the Spirit: “For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body” (1 Corinthians 12:13).


The question is not, “Do they fit our exact standard?” but rather, “Are they in Christ?”


3. The Folly of Human Strength


Psalm 127:1 declares: “Except the LORD build the house, they labour in vain that build it.” No matter how carefully we design our church rules, no matter how pure we believe our doctrine or practice to be, if Christ is not building it, our labor will end in vanity.


Israel tried to build religion their way, and the Lord said through Isaiah: “This people draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honour me, but have removed their heart far from me” (Isaiah 29:13). We must beware lest we do the same.


4. God’s Way of Building


The true church is built by:


The preaching of Christ crucified (1 Corinthians 1:23).


The power of the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:47).


The Word of God in truth (John 17:17).


Love that flows from Christ (John 13:35).


These are the marks of God’s building, not man’s regulations. If our distinctives are elevated above the gospel, we have ceased to be co-laborers with God and have made ourselves master-builders of our own little kingdom.


Conclusion: Whose Church?


If we insist on building a church where only those who meet our man-made criteria may belong, then it is not God’s church—it is ours. We have become the lord of that assembly. But Christ does not call us to build our church; He calls us to be living stones in His church (1 Peter 2:5).


The great question remains: Are we co-laborers with Christ, submitting to His Word and Spirit, or are we attempting to establish a monument to our own will?


Let us humble ourselves under Christ’s headship, remembering His words: “I will build my church.” And if it is His church, then only His way will stand.



Sep 20, 2025

To those who show mercy, mercy will be shown

“To those who show mercy, mercy will be shown”

This echoes Matthew 5:7 and James 2:13:

  • “Blessed are the merciful, for they shall receive mercy.”

  • “Judgment without mercy will be shown to anyone who has not been merciful. Mercy triumphs over judgment.”

In other words, how we treat others reveals how much we’ve truly received and understood God’s mercy.


Why the church should show mercy to NIV / ESV readers

  • All true translations point to Christ. NIV, ESV, KJV, and others translate the same inspired Scriptures. The goal is not to worship a translation, but to know the Lord.

  • Different people need different helps. Some find the KJV’s beauty uplifting; others find the NIV’s clarity or ESV’s precision helpful. Showing mercy means recognizing that God uses various translations to reach different hearts.

  • Unity is greater than uniformity. Romans 14:13 reminds us not to put stumbling blocks in front of fellow believers. Mercy toward those who use another translation is part of Christlike love.


Why some who hold to KJV seem merciless toward others

Not all KJV readers are merciless, but in some circles:

  • Conviction becomes pride. Some equate the KJV with the only true Bible, so they condemn others as “corrupted.”

  • Fear of error. Out of zeal for purity of Scripture, some react strongly against newer translations, but this can lead to harshness.

  • Cultural/language loyalty. For some, the KJV represents heritage, identity, and spiritual roots — so rejecting it feels like rejecting their faith itself.

The problem is not the KJV itself, but the spirit of exclusivity that can creep in.


The Better Way: Mercy in Disagreement

  • Ephesians 4:2–3: “Be completely humble and gentle; be patient, bearing with one another in love. Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit.”

  • Mercy says: “I love you as a brother/sister, even if you read a different translation.”

  • The test of true maturity is not which Bible version we defend, but whether our hearts reflect Christ’s compassion.


The church should show mercy to those reading NIV, ESV, or any faithful translation because mercy is the heart of God and the mark of true discipleship. Some KJV-only believers act mercilessly out of fear, pride, or misunderstanding — but Jesus calls all His followers to let mercy triumph over judgment.



Martin Luther

Martin Luther used remarkably vulgar, coarse, and scatological language in his writings and table talks. This was not an occasional slip but a consistent and deliberate part of his rhetorical style, which he used for emphasis, ridicule, and to connect with the common people.


Here are detailed examples categorized by his targets:


1. Against the Papacy and Catholic Clergy

Luther reserved his most graphic language for the Pope, bishops, and priests, whom he labeled as the "Antichrist."

The "Ass-Pope" and "Papal Ass": Luther frequently used the German word Eselskopff (ass's head) and Papstesel (Papal ass). In his 1545 pamphlet "Against the Papacy at Rome, Founded by the Devil," he included vicious woodcut images commissioned by him, depicting the Pope being defecated and vomited out of the mouth of a demonic monster. The text is equally graphic.

Excrement and Latrines: He often compared the doctrines and decrees of the Church to excrement. In his commentary on Galatians, he wrote:

    "The Pope and his vermin… fill the world with their dung, their filth, their stinking ordinances and traditions."

    He famously suggested that the Devil, after tempting him, would eventually "void and empty his belly… a papal decretal of the most exquisite sort would come out."

    Sodomy and Depravity: He frequently accused monks and priests of homosexuality and perversion in graphic terms. In his Table Talks, he stated that monasteries and convents were nothing but "brothels" and that the clergy were "sodomites."


2. Against Theological Opponents (e.g., Lord Albrecht of Mainz)

When Lord Albrecht of Mainz continued to sell indulgences, Luther wrote him a letter in 1539 that was filled with shocking insults:


"You should show your contempt for the devil, who has made such an ass of you, and stop protecting your vomit and your shit… those blasphemous, poisonous indulgences of yours."


He then suggested that Albrecht should have a "vomiting spell" to purge himself of his indulgences and his "idolatries."


3. Against the Devil

Luther's scatological battles were not just against human opponents but also against the Devil during his periods of spiritual anguish (Anfechtungen).


The "Fart" Defense: One of the most famous anecdotes comes from his Table Talks. When plagued by the Devil, Luther is reported to have proclaimed:

"I have fought against him with flatulence." (The original German is more vulgar: *"Ich hab ihn mit Furzen abgewehrt").

Defecating on the Devil: In another instance, he is said to have told the Devil: "I shit on you and in your name." This was his way of expressing utter contempt and rejecting the Devil's accusations, believing that the victory of Christ made the Devil a defeated, contemptible foe.


4. General Vulgarities and Earthy Language

Luther's vulgarity extended to his general writing and speech:


In his "On the Jews and Their Lies" (1543), he uses extremely coarse language, recommending that synagogues and Jewish homes be burned, and that Jews be subjected to hard labor or expelled.

He commonly used phrases like:

    Leck mich am Arschn ("Kiss my ass")

    Dreck ("filth" or "shit") to describe worthless ideas.

    Hurenkind ("whore's child" or "son of a whore") as a general insult.


Conclusion

Martin Luther's use of vulgarity was intentional, strategic, and prolific. It was an integral part of his identity as a blunt, passionate reformer who believed he was engaged in a cosmic war. To remove this vulgarity from the historical record is to sanitize and misunderstand his character and the ferocity of the Reformation conflict.

For modern readers, it is jarring and can be offensive. Scholars debate its effectiveness; while it undoubtedly made his writing memorable and powerful to his supporters, it also made reconciliation with his opponents impossible and contributed to the violent and divisive nature of the period. It remains one of the most striking and controversial aspects of his vast literary legacy.



Vulgar Language in Reformation

Martin Luther, the 16th-century reformer, often used harsh, earthy, and sometimes vulgar language in his polemical writings and sermons. His style was deliberately blunt; he wanted to shock, ridicule, and undermine his opponents (both the papacy and other reformers he disagreed with). For Luther, this wasn’t just uncontrolled anger — he saw strong language as a rhetorical weapon in a spiritual battle.

Here are some detailed examples from his works (translated into English from the German or Latin originals):


1. Against the Papacy at Rome, Founded by the Devil (1545)

  • Luther calls the Pope:

    “the most hellish father, St. Paul’s stinking bag of maggots”
    “the devil’s whore and sodomite.”

  • He also compares the papal court to a brothel and cesspool.


2. Table Talk (Tischreden)

  • In casual conversations recorded by his students, Luther often used barnyard or toilet humor.

  • He said of the Pope:

    “I resist the devil, and often it is with a fart that I chase him away.”

  • He frequently equated false teaching with excrement, e.g., “The papists are like donkeys, full of nothing but dung.”


3. On the Bondage of the Will (1525) – against Erasmus

  • Luther tells Erasmus:

    “Your whole book is so useless and full of crap (merda), I think you must have shat it out in a single session.”

  • He calls Erasmus’ arguments “stinking scum” and accuses him of being “a mouth and anus equally open.”


4. Against the Roman Papacy, an Institution of the Devil (1545)

  • Luther refers to the papal decretals (church laws) as:

    “Devil’s excrement, dung sprinkled with holy water.”


5. Letter to Duke George (1532)

  • Luther calls the Duke “a pig, ass, and mad fool” and says:

    “You are a brothel-keeper and the devil’s spawn in hell.”


Why Luther used such vulgarity ?

  • Theological conviction: He believed the papacy and certain opponents were agents of Satan, so he chose language meant to unmask and ridicule them.

  • Cultural context: Early modern German polemics often employed scatological humor and invective; Luther was especially gifted at it.

  • Accessibility: His rough speech resonated with common people who lived in a world of earthy metaphors.


Martin Luther repeatedly used vulgar, scatological, and insulting language in his writings and speeches. Examples include calling papal decrees “devil’s excrement,” mocking opponents with references to farting and dung, and describing his adversaries as donkeys, pigs, or brothel-keepers. His aim was to ridicule, expose, and discredit those he saw as enemies of the gospel.



Sarcastic

The apostle Paul used sarcasm in his letters. While the Bible is a sacred text, it contains a variety of human literary styles, including irony, satire, and sharp, sarcastic rebuke.


Paul's use of sarcasm is almost always a rhetorical device to make a powerful point, usually to correct serious errors in thinking or behavior within the early churches. He uses it to shock his readers into seeing the absurdity of a position they are considering.


The Clearest Example: Sarcasm in Galatians

The most famous and undeniable example of Paul's sarcasm is found in his letter to the Galatians. The church was being influenced by "Judaizers"—people who insisted that Gentile (non-Jewish) converts must be circumcised and follow the Jewish Law (the Torah) in order to be truly saved.


Paul argues vehemently that salvation is by grace through faith in Christ alone, not by works of the Law. His frustration peaks, and he unleashes some of the most biting sarcasm in the New Testament.


Example 1: Galatians 5:12

"As for those agitators, I wish they would go the whole way and emasculate themselves!" (NIV)


The Context: The Judaizers were insisting that Gentile believers be circumcised (a minor surgical procedure) to be saved.


The Sarcasm: Paul takes their argument to its shocking, logical extreme. He says, in effect, "If you think cutting a little flesh for circumcision makes you so holy and righteous, why stop there? If physical mutilation is the path to God, then go all the way and castrate yourselves!" This was a brutal and humorous put-down. He wasn't literally wishing them harm; he was using extreme hyperbole to show that their entire premise—that physical acts save you—was flawed and dangerous.


Example 2: The "Foolish" Galatians

Earlier in the letter, Paul uses a sarcastic tone to express his utter amazement at their foolishness.

"You foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you?" (Galatians 3:1, NIV)

The word "foolish" here (anoētoi in Greek) doesn't just mean silly; it means "mindless" or "lacking understanding." "Bewitched" implies they've been put under a magical spell. This is sarcastic hyperbole—they haven't literally been hexed, but Paul is so baffled by their irrational behavior that he describes it as if they are under a dark magic that has made them lose their minds.


Other Examples of Paul's Sarcasm and Irony

1. 2 Corinthians 11-12: The "Fool's Speech"

Paul is forced to defend his apostolic authority against "super-apostles" who were boasting about their credentials, visions, and miracles to win over the Corinthian church. Paul responds with heavy irony by engaging in the same kind of boasting, but in a way that subverts it.


"I repeat: Let no one take me for a fool. But if you do, then tolerate me just as you would a fool, so that I may do a little boasting. In this self-confident boasting I am not talking as the Lord would, but as a fool... I am out of my mind to talk like this." (2 Corinthians 11:16-17, 23a)


He then lists his real credentials: beatings, shipwrecks, hunger, and suffering for Christ—the opposite of the glamorous boasts of his opponents. He sarcastically calls it "boasting of his weaknesses" (2 Cor 12:9), turning the world's concept of power and status upside down.


2. 1 Corinthians 4:8: Mocking Complacency

The Corinthian church was prideful and arrogant, believing they were already spiritually rich and kings who had arrived.


"Already you have all you want! Already you have become rich! You have begun to reign—and that without us! How I wish that you really had begun to reign so that we also might reign with you!" (NIV)


Paul is holding up a mirror to their arrogance. He is saying, "Oh, so you're already full, rich, and ruling like kings? That's amazing! How wonderful for you! I wish that were true..." His tone is clearly mocking, pointing out the vast gap between their self-perception and the spiritual immaturity they were actually displaying.


Why Did Paul Use Sarcasm?

It's important to understand that Paul wasn't just being mean. His sarcasm served several purposes:


To Shock and Awaken: It was a wake-up call for people who were drifting into dangerous theological error.


To Highlight Absurdity: It's an effective tool to show how ridiculous a false idea is by taking it to its logical conclusion.


Rhetorical Force: In the ancient Greco-Roman world, skilled debaters and orators often used irony and sarcasm to persuade an audience and dismantle an opponent's argument.


Paul did write sarcastically in the Bible. His most famous and sharpest examples are found in Galatians, where he uses it as a powerful weapon to defend the core truth of the gospel of grace.



Sep 17, 2025

The Power That Overcomes

Let us pray. Heavenly Father, we come before you this morning from many different places. Wherever we are, we ask that you meet us here now.

Help us to see our own struggles and our own need for a faith that depends utterly on you. Quiet the arguments in our minds and the distractions in our spirits, that we might hear from you today. We ask this in the mighty name of Jesus. Amen.

The title of the sermon this morning is “The Power That Overcomes.” Scripture Reading: Mark 9:14-29 

Introduction: The Argument in the Valley

Good morning, church. If you have your Bibles, please turn with me to the Gospel of Mark, chapter 9.

Just before our passage today, we have one of the mountaintop experiences of the Bible. Jesus took Peter, James, and John up a high mountain, and He was transfigured before them. His clothes became dazzling white, and He spoke with Moses and Elijah. It was a moment of divine confirmation, glory, and awe.

But now, in verse 14, they descend from that mountain-top glory and immediately step into a scene of chaos, confusion, and conflict. They find an arguing crowd, frustrated disciples, and a desperate father with a suffering son. It’s a stark reminder that our Christian life isn't lived only on the mountaintop; it’s lived in the valleys where real human suffering and spiritual battles rage.

I. The Reason for the Argument (v. 14-18)

The text says that when Jesus arrived, He saw a great crowd around His disciples, and the teachers of the law were arguing with them. What was the argument about?

The context tells us. A man had brought his demon-possessed son to the disciples for healing, and they had utterly failed. The argument, therefore, was almost certainly about authority and power. 

The crowd was amazed when Jesus arrived, but the father was desperate. He steps through the controversy and gets to the heart of the matter: "I brought my son to your disciples, but they could not heal him."

II. The Nature of the Battle (v. 17-22)

What kind of evil spirit are we dealing with here? This wasn't a minor affliction. This was a powerful, destructive, and violent evil spirit.

It robbed the boy of his speech.

It threw him into convulsions.

It made him foam at the mouth and gnash his teeth.

It tried to destroy him by throwing him into fire or water.

This spirit was characterized by its desire to cause the boy to lose the power of hearing, it desire to distort, and destroy. It sought to isolate the boy from communication, to twist his body and life, and ultimately to annihilate him. This is the ultimate aim of the enemy in our lives: to isolate us, distort God’s truth and image in us, and steal, kill, and destroy (John 10:10).

The father’s plea is one of the most saddening in Scripture: "But if you can do anything, take pity on us and help us." He’s saying, "I’ve almost lost hope, but if there’s any possibility… please."

III. The Source of Authority (v. 23-27)

Jesus’ response is breathtaking. He doesn’t say, "Well, let’s see what I can do." He immediately reframes the entire issue from the man’s "if you can" to the real question: " ‘If you can’? Everything is possible for one who believes."

Jesus redirects the focus from His ability—which is absolute—to the man’s faith. He is inviting the father out of the paralysis of doubt and into the possibility of belief.

The father’s beautiful, honest cry becomes a model prayer for all of us: "I do believe; help me overcome my unbelief!" He confesses the little faith he has while asking Jesus to fill the gaps. And Jesus honors that honest, struggling faith.

What happens next is a masterclass in authority. Jesus doesn’t perform a long ritual. He doesn’t plead with the spirit. He simply commands it. "You deaf and mute spirit," he said, "I command you, come out of him and never enter him again."

Did Jesus have the authority? Absolutely. The spirit has no choice but to obey its Creator. It shrieks and convulses the boy one last time, a final act of malice, and then it leaves. The boy lies so still that the crowd thinks he’s dead. But Jesus, full of compassion and power, takes his hand and lifts him up—whole, free, and restored. Where the spirit brought death, Jesus brings resurrection life.

IV. The Secret of Their Failure (v. 28-29)

Later, in private, the disciples ask the question, "Why couldn’t we drive it out?"

Jesus’ answer is simple and profound: "This kind can come out only by prayer."

Their failure was not a lack of technique. It wasn't that they forgot the right words. Their failure was a lack of a dependent relationship. Perhaps they had begun to trust in the gift of authority rather than the Giver of that authority. They had been sent out and given power (Mark 6:7), but they may have started to rely on that past commissioning rather than on a present, moment-by-moment dependence on God.

Jesus says this kind of deep-seated, powerful stronghold of evil only submits to a power greater than itself—the power of God, accessed through prayer. Prayer is the posture of total dependence. It is the declaration that "I cannot, but God can." The disciples had likely moved from prayerful dependence to a self-reliant habit.

Let me give an Illustration: Imagine a skilled surgeon or doctor. She has all the right tools: a scalpel, clamps, and monitors. She even has the textbook knowledge of anatomy and procedure. But one day, in the middle of a complex operation, the power goes out. The lights go dark. The life-support machines flicker and die. In that moment, her tools and knowledge are rendered almost useless. Why? Because she has been severed from the source of power that makes everything else work.

This is what happened to the disciples. They had been given the tools—the authority to drive out demons. They had seen the procedure—they had watched Jesus do it. But in this moment, they were operating in their own strength, disconnected from the ultimate source of power. They had the tools, but they had forgotten to plug into the power source of prayer.

Application: For Our Lives Today. So, what does this mean for us? 

1. Should the church continue to drive out demons? Yes, but we must understand our role. Our authority is not our own; it is derived solely from Jesus Christ. We do not command in our name; we command in His name and under His authority. The church is called to continue Jesus' ministry of setting the captives free (Luke 4:18). This involves both the proclamation of freedom from the guilt of sin and, at times, the demonstration of power over spiritual oppression.

2. How do we apply this to our daily lives?

Cultivate Honest Faith: Like the father of that boy, bring our mixed-up faith to Jesus. "I believe; help my unbelief!" is a prayer He will always answer. He honors honest struggle more than pretended certainty.

Rely on Prayer, Not Formula: We must fight the temptation to reduce our faith to a formula. The power is not in our methods, but in our connection to the Source. Stay rooted in prayer—not as a last resort, but as a first response.

Bring our Battles to Jesus: Whatever "spirit" we are facing—be it addiction, despair, anxiety, bitterness—it is a spirit that seeks to deafen us to God’s voice, distort our identity, and destroy our life. Do what the father did: bypass the arguing crowd and bring our problem directly to Jesus.

Point to the One with Authority: When we experience victory, we must be like Jesus: we take the hand of the broken and lift them up. We point them not to our power, but to the power of Christ. We are merely the channel of His grace.

As a conclusion: The argument in the valley was settled not by a better theological debate, but by the powerful, compassionate authority of Jesus Christ. The disciples’ failure was cured not by a new technique, but by a call back to prayerful dependence.

Church, we live in a world full of arguments and deep suffering. The answer to both is the same: bringing people to a direct encounter with the living Christ. He is the one with all authority. He is the one who commands the waves and the demons, and they obey. And He invites us, His often-failing disciples, to partner with Him in His work—not from a place of our own strength, but from our knees, in prayer, fully dependent on Him.

Let us pray: Lord Jesus, we thank you for your Word. We thank you that you are not a distant God, but one who steps into the chaos of our lives with authority and compassion.

Today, we confess that so often, we are like the disciples. We try to fight our battles with yesterday’s faith, relying on our own strength and understanding. Forgive us for our self-reliance. Forgive us for our prayerlessness.

And so, we echo the cry of the father in this story: “We do believe; help us overcome our unbelief!”

Fill the gaps in our faith. Bring us back into the power source of a living, moment-by-moment relationship with you.

We bring before you now the specific “evil spirits” in our lives—the addictions, the despair, the anxieties, the pride that seeks to distort and destroy us. We command them to flee in the mighty name of Jesus, and we ask for your healing hand to lift us up, to make us whole, and to set us free. Send us out from this place, not in our own power, but in yours, empowered by your Spirit and dependent on your strength. It is in your victorious name, Jesus, we pray. Amen.



Sep 16, 2025

Self-help with God’s help is the best help ???

The statement “Self-help with God’s help is the best help” tries to combine human effort and divine support. On the surface, it sounds positive—it recognizes that we must take responsibility for our lives while also depending on God. But the problem lies in how it frames the relationship between human effort and God’s role.


Possible Problems with the Statement


It makes self the primary focus.

The phrase begins with “self-help” and positions God’s help as something added on. This can make it sound like I am the main agent of change, and God is just a helper. In many faith traditions (especially Christianity), this inverts the order: God is the true source of strength, and we participate by cooperating with His will.


It risks implying independence from God.

If “self-help” is seen as sufficient with only a little boost from God, it downplays our complete dependence on Him (“Without Me you can do nothing” – John 15:5).


It may promote a works-based mindset.

It can suggest that God’s help is conditional upon how well we help ourselves, instead of being rooted in grace. While effort and discipline matter, they are not the foundation—God’s grace is.


It doesn’t acknowledge that God sometimes works beyond or without our effort.

The Bible shows times when God delivers, strengthens, or transforms people who were powerless to “help themselves.”


A More Balanced View

Partnership, not hierarchy: A better way to phrase it might be, “God’s help, with our cooperation, is the best help.”

This keeps God at the center while acknowledging that we do have a role: to act responsibly, use our gifts, and respond to His grace.

The truth is not “self-help with God’s help” but “God’s help, with our trust and cooperation.”



“The Lord Will Raise a Standard”

Scripture Text: Isaiah 59:19

Theme: When the enemy floods the church with deception or division, the Spirit of the Lord raises up Christ as the true standard for His people.

In a battlefield where soldiers rally when a banner is lifted high. The banner tells them where to gather, who they belong to, and under whom they fight.

Isaiah uses that imagery to show us that when the enemy comes in like a flood, God Himself raises His banner, His standard, to protect His people and glorify His name.


1. The Reality of the Enemy’s Flood

“When the enemy shall come in like a flood…”

The enemy often overwhelms—false teachings, pride, divisions, worldliness.

Debates like Verbal Plenary Preservation, Perfect TR, or KJV-Onlyism—when elevated to gospel level—become floods that distract from Christ.

Gnosticism in early church is similar flood, secret knowledge, elitism, “we know better.” The same spirit resurfaces today.

We should not be surprised when floods come—Jesus warned that false teachers would arise (Matthew 24:24).

What “floods” are threatening our church or our own walk with Christ?


2. The Spirit of the Lord Raises the Standard

“…the Spirit of the LORD shall lift up a standard against him.”

The “standard” (Hebrew nes) is the banner, rallying point, signal of victory.

This is not human cleverness, but God Himself taking action through His Spirit.

In Christ, God has raised the ultimate banner:

John 12:32 – Jesus lifted up on the cross draws all people.

Isaiah 11:10 – The Root of Jesse stands as a signal/banner for the peoples.

2 Corinthians 4:5 – We preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus as Lord.

When arguments arise that exalt human opinions or translations above Christ, the Spirit raises Christ Himself as the banner: His cross, His Word, His gospel.

Our calling is to rally under that banner—not under a man, not under a version, but under the crucified and risen Lord.


3. The Standard in the Church Today

How does God raise this “standard” when floods come? Three ways:


Faithful Preaching of Christ

God raises pastors and teachers who center their sermons on Christ and the cross.


Humble Christlike Living

God raises up believers whose humility and mercy rebuke the pride of elitist teaching.


Unity of the Church in the Gospel

God raises congregations that refuse to be divided by non-essentials.


By way of application,

Am I rallying under Christ’s banner, or am I waving my own?

Do my words and actions promote unity under the gospel, or do they divide?


4. Fear of the Lord and Glory to His Name

“So shall they fear the name of the LORD from the west, and his glory from the rising of the sun.”

When God raises His standard, His glory is revealed from east to west.

The nations see not us, not our arguments, but Christ lifted up.

The end goal is not winning a debate—it is the glory of Christ across the earth.

The true church fears His name, not the name of a movement or translation.


Conclusion

The enemy will come like a flood. False teachings and divisions will always press in.

But we have hope, the Spirit of the Lord raises a standard. That standard is Christ lifted up, Christ proclaimed, Christ embodied in His people.

Our call is rallying under the banner of Jesus, not under man-made flags.


Illustration:

In a battle where soldiers, scattered and afraid, saw their flag rise again on the hilltop. It gave them courage, hope, and unity. In the same way, when the church feels overwhelmed, look up—Christ is our Banner.


Closing Prayer

Lord God, we thank You that when the enemy comes in like a flood, You raise up Your standard against him. Forgive us when we have lifted up ourselves, our ideas, or our preferences instead of Your Son. Teach us to rally under the cross of Christ, to live humbly, to preach faithfully, and to walk in unity. May Your glory be known from the rising of the sun to its setting, as Christ is lifted up in our lives and in our church. In His precious name we pray, Amen.




Isaiah 59:19

1. Exposition of Isaiah 59:19


Isaiah 59:19 (KJV) reads:

“So shall they fear the name of the LORD from the west, and his glory from the rising of the sun. When the enemy shall come in like a flood, the Spirit of the LORD shall lift up a standard against him.”


Other translations, like the ESV, render the second half differently:

“…for he will come like a rushing stream, which the wind of the LORD drives.”


The Hebrew word here, נָס (nes), is often translated as “standard,” “signal,” or “banner.” It is a military image: when the enemy comes in, the Lord raises His banner to rally His people, to signal His presence, and to resist the onslaught. The heart of the verse is this: when opposition rises like a flood, God Himself intervenes. He raises His banner, His standard, His Spirit, to protect His people and glorify His name.


2. Applying This to the Church Today

If movements such as Verbal Plenary Preservation (as an exclusive doctrine), Perfect TR, or KJV-Onlyism elevate human tradition or a single translation above Christ Himself, they risk becoming tools of division—an “enemy within” that disrupts unity and distracts from the gospel.

Isaiah 59:19 reassures us: when such errors flood the church, the Spirit of the Lord raises a standard against them. God is not passive; He actively guards His people.


3. What Is This “Standard” in the Church?

The standard God raises is not a human invention, nor another debate, but the Word of God rightly proclaimed and Christ Himself exalted. Here are three ways this “standard” may appear in the church:


Faithful Preaching of the Whole Counsel of God

When the enemy floods in with prideful teaching that exalts human traditions, the Spirit raises up humble pastors and teachers who faithfully preach Christ and Him crucified. This preaching draws people back to the central gospel, away from needless divisions.

The Mandarin Congregation in Calvary Pandan begins to split because of arguments over Bible versions. But the Spirit empowers a pastor to open the Scriptures, showing that the true authority is not in one translation, but in the living Christ revealed through the Word. Hearts are softened, and unity is restored under Christ’s banner.


The Banner of Christ’s Humility and Mercy

The “standard” is also the life of Christ embodied in His people—servants who show humility, mercy, and love. When prideful voices dominate with “secret knowledge” or elitism, God raises up believers who quietly live out the gospel, proving by their fruits what is true.

In a seminary classroom, some students boast of their knowledge about manuscripts and translations. But another student, filled with the Spirit, stands out by his humility, kindness, and Christlike character. His life itself becomes a rebuke and a reminder of what matters most: Christ in us, the hope of glory.


The Unity of the Church under the Gospel

The Spirit raises the church itself as a standard, when believers together refuse to let non-essentials divide them. They rally around the cross, not around personal preferences.

A Synod decides: “We will not let translation debates fracture our fellowship. We affirm the authority of Scripture in faithful translations, but our focus will remain on preaching Christ, making disciples, and living the gospel.” That decision becomes the banner of the Spirit against the flood of division.


4. Conclusion

Isaiah 59:19 shows us that when falsehood, pride, or divisive teachings rise up like a flood, the Spirit of the Lord Himself raises a banner. That banner is Christ exalted, the gospel proclaimed, humility embodied, and the unity of God’s people preserved.

If KJV-Onlyism or similar movements become an “enemy” by distracting from Christ, then God’s response will not be another ideology, but the lifting up of Christ as the true Standard.

As Jesus said in John 12:32: “And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself.” That is the ultimate “standard” God raises—Christ crucified and risen, drawing hearts back to Him.



A Pastoral Message of Admonition and Appeal

Beloved followers of the Way,

Grace and peace to you in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.

I write to you with both concern and love, mindful of Paul’s words in 2 Corinthians 4:5: “For what we preach is not ourselves, but Jesus Christ as Lord, and ourselves as your servants for Jesus’ sake.”

The apostle is clear—our calling is not to promote ourselves, nor to build followers around our own ideas, but to exalt Christ alone as Lord. The church is not sustained by human arguments, intellectual pride, or claims to special knowledge. It is upheld by the gospel of Jesus Christ, crucified and risen, proclaimed in humility and in truth.

Yet it grieves me to see how secondary debates over Bible translations and human theories are being elevated above Christ Himself. When positions such as “Verbal Plenary Preservation,” the “Perfect TR,” or exclusive allegiance to one English translation are presented as tests of true faith, they risk becoming burdens that divide the body rather than doctrines that unite it. These positions may be borne out of zeal, but zeal without humility and gospel-centeredness can unwittingly mirror the very gnostic spirit that Paul and John warned against—a spirit that exalts secret knowledge, human certainty, and rigid sectarianism over the simplicity of Christ.

Brother, hear the Lord’s call: return to the pure gospel. The church does not exist to defend human systems or to magnify a particular translation. The church exists to proclaim Christ crucified, to preach the Word faithfully in the languages of God’s people, and to serve one another in love.

Paul himself, once a Pharisee of Pharisees, could have boasted in many things. But in Philippians 3:8, he says: “I count everything as loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord.” This is our posture too: to lay down pride, to count as loss our intellectual trophies, and to lift high Christ alone.

Please consider: are your words pointing others to Christ, or are they drawing attention to your own certainty, your own positions, your own cause? If the latter, then repent and return to the humility of Christ, who came not to be served but to serve. Let us be servants of one another for Jesus’ sake, not masters over one another in debates that fracture His body.

As Paul says in 2 Corinthians 4:6, “For God, who said, ‘Let light shine out of darkness,’ has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.” That is the true treasure—the glory of God revealed in the face of Christ, not in the promotion of ourselves or our own theological constructs.

I plead with you, in the love of Christ: return to the Lord’s simple call. Set aside divisive speculation. Fix your eyes again on Jesus, and let your teaching, your life, and your ministry exalt Him alone.


With sorrow and hope,


A Pastoral Appeal for Grace and Unity

Leaders in Christ,

I write to you with deep respect for your devotion to God’s Word and your love for the Lord Jesus Christ. The care you show in guarding the Scriptures and your commitment to the truth is evident, and for that I give thanks. At the same time, I come with a heartfelt plea for grace, rooted in the gospel we all cherish.

Our Lord Jesus prayed that His people would be one, even as He and the Father are one (John 17:21). The apostle Paul reminds us that in Christ there is “one body and one Spirit—just as you were called to one hope when you were called—one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all” (Eph. 4:4–6). While differences in translation preference are real and sometimes deeply felt, I urge you in the Spirit of Christ to extend forgiveness, acceptance, and love toward brothers and sisters who read from the NIV or other faithful translations of God’s Word.

The gospel itself teaches us: “Forgive as the Lord forgave you” (Col. 3:13). We know that none of us comes to God by the purity of our works or the perfection of our knowledge, but only through the mercy of Christ. In the same way, may we not withhold fellowship or acceptance from those whom Christ has already welcomed. If God has poured His Spirit upon men and women reading the NIV, drawing them to repentance, faith, and holiness, can we not also embrace them as fellow heirs of grace?

Leaders, I am not asking you to abandon your convictions, but to adorn them with charity. Hold fast to your love for the King James Bible, but let that love be accompanied by patience and gentleness toward others who also seek to know God through His Word. In doing so, your testimony will shine even brighter—not only for your faithfulness to Scripture but also for your reflection of the love of Christ.

May the Lord strengthen you, fill you with His peace, and grant you joy as you shepherd His people in the spirit of unity.


With respect and love in Christ,

Lawrence Wong

Sep 11, 2025

Wrong Tradition

The KJV-only position—that the King James Version is the only true or valid Bible translation—is a tradition that arose in the last century, mainly in reaction to modern Bible translations. While the KJV is a beautiful and historically important translation, the idea that it is the only inspired or preserved Word of God is problematic for several reasons:


Why KJV-onlyism is a wrong tradition


It elevates a translation above the original texts

The Bible was written in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. The KJV is a translation, not the original. To claim that one English translation is more inspired than the God-breathed originals is backwards—it makes the translation the standard rather than the Scriptures themselves.


It confuses preservation with one version

God promised to preserve His Word (Isaiah 40:8), but preservation does not mean through a single 17th-century English edition. The Word has been preserved through thousands of manuscripts and translations in many languages, allowing God’s truth to reach all peoples.


It ignores the need for clarity in language

English has changed dramatically since 1611. Words like “let,” “prevent,” “conversation,” or “quick” don’t mean the same today. If people misunderstand God’s Word because of outdated language, the translation becomes a barrier rather than a blessing.


It repeats the mistake of clinging to tradition over truth

Before the Reformation, the Latin Vulgate held the same place of untouchable authority in the Western church. Many leaders said, “The Vulgate is the Bible.” Reformers like Wycliffe, Tyndale, Luther, and others challenged this by returning to the Hebrew and Greek, translating into common languages so that people could understand God’s Word.


In the same way, KJV-onlyism repeats the same error—it insists on one traditional version rather than encouraging ongoing faithful translations from the original languages.


Why I do not follow KJV-onlyism


I don’t reject the KJV itself—it is still a faithful and beautiful translation—but I reject the tradition that says it alone is the Bible. My reason is simple: I want to follow the example of the Reformers, who left the exclusive reliance on the Latin Vulgate. They understood that the authority lies in God’s Word as given in the original languages, and translations must serve people by making that Word clear and accurate in their own tongue.


Just as they did not stay bound to Jerome’s Vulgate, I do not want to be bound to the King James Version alone. I honor it, but I also embrace other faithful translations that help God’s Word shine with clarity for today.


KJV-onlyism is like clinging to the Latin Vulgate in the Middle Ages—it confuses tradition with truth. I don’t follow it because I believe God’s Word is greater than any single translation, and like the Reformers, I want Scripture to be understood clearly in the language of the people.



Since All Bible Translations Are Imperfect, How Can We Speak of an Inerrant Bible?

Answering Bible Difficulties – Question 31

Original: 

https://www.blueletterbible.org/Comm/stewart_don/faq/bible-difficulties/question31-how-can-we-speak-of-an-inerrant-bible.cfm

It is objected that the Scripture today cannot be called inerrant because each translation made from the original is imperfect. Indeed, no matter what language the Bible is translated into, there will always be imperfections. How, therefore, can the Bible today be spoken of as the inerrant Word of God when most people read it in an imperfect translation?

Response

We respond to this accusation with the following points:

The Message Comes Through in Translations

Admittedly, there is no translation of Scripture that is perfect. Each has its deficiencies. Those who translate the Scripture recognize this. Yet the meaning of the passages can be adequately communicated from one language to the next. For example, a simple comparison of good English translations of Scripture will demonstrate that the meanings of each passage will be shown to be the same, even if the wording is different. The message of Scripture comes out crystal clear.

Translations Have More Things Right than Wrong

With respect to the major Bible translations that have been produced, there is much more right with them than things that are wrong. The things that are wrong are usually insignificant and they do not affect the central message. Consequently, people can read these translations with the confidence that they are reading the Word of God.

A Lesson from the New Testament and the Septuagint

An example of how an imperfect translation can still be the inerrant Word of God is found in the usage that the New Testament writers make of the of the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Hebrew Old Testament. The New Testament quotes the Septuagint about one hundred and sixty specific times. Thirteen of those times, when quoting the Old Testament, the New Testament writers call the Septuagint, “Scripture.” This shows that the Septuagint, an imperfect Greek translation of the Hebrew original, is still considered to be Holy Scripture.

These quotations are as follows:

Matthew 21:42

Jesus cites the Septuagint when speaking of His predicted rejection by His own people—the Jews. We read in Matthew:

Jesus said to them, “Have you never read in the Scriptures: ‘The stone which the builders rejected has become the chief cornerstone. This was the LORD’s doing, And it is marvelous in our eyes?’” (Matthew 21:42 NKJV)

This cites Psalm 117:22-23 in the Septuagint. It is Psalm 118:22-23 in English translations. Jesus believed the Septuagint could be equated with Scripture.

Luke 4:18-1921

The Septuagint was cited by Jesus when He read from the scroll of Isaiah in a synagogue in Nazareth. It reads as follows:

Now Jesus came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up, and went into the synagogue on the Sabbath day, as was his custom. He stood up to read, and the scroll of the prophet Isaiah was given to him. He unrolled the scroll and found the place where it was written, “The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim release to the captives and the regaining of sight to the blind, to set free those who are oppressed, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.” Then he rolled up the scroll, gave it back to the attendant, and sat down. The eyes of everyone in the synagogue were fixed on him. Then he began to tell them, “Today this scripture has been fulfilled even as you heard it being read.” (Luke 4:16-21 NET)

Jesus is citing Isaiah 61:1-2, He called the passage from which He read “Scripture.” Again, the Septuagint is considered to be Scripture.

John 13:18

When Jesus said the Scriptures predicted His betrayal by one who was close to Him He cited the Septuagint. We read the following in the Gospel of John:

I do not speak concerning all of you. I know whom I have chosen; but that the Scripture may be fulfilled, ‘He who eats bread with Me has lifted up his heel against Me.’ (John 13:18 NKJV)

This cites Psalm 40:9 in the Septuagint (Psalm 41:9 in English translations). The Greek text of the Old Testament is cited here, and declared to be Scripture.

Acts 8:32-33

When leaving Jerusalem, the Ethiopian eunuch was reading the Septuagint translation of the Old Testament about the prediction of God’s suffering servant. The Bible records it as follows:

Now the passage of the scripture that he was reading was this: “Like a sheep he was led to the slaughter, and like a lamb silent before its shearer, so he does not open his mouth. In his humiliation justice was denied him. Who can describe his generation? For his life is taken away from the earth.” (Acts 8:32-33 NRSV)

This is citing Isaiah 53:7-8, in the Septuagint.

Romans 4:3

Paul quotes the Septuagint when referring to the faith of Abraham. He said to the Romans:

For the Scriptures tell us, “Abraham believed God, so God declared him to be righteous.” (Romans 4:3 NLT)

The passage cited is Genesis 15:6 and it is called Scripture.

Romans 9:17

Paul cites the Septuagint when speaking of God’s reason for the raising up of the Pharaoh of Egypt. He wrote to the church at Rome:

For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.” (Romans 9:17 ESV)

The New Living Translation says:

For the Scriptures say that God told Pharaoh, “I have appointed you for the very purpose of displaying my power in you, and so that my fame might spread throughout the earth.” (Romans 9:17 NLT)

Paul is citing Exodus 9:16 in the Septuagint and calls it Scripture.

Romans 11:3-4

The Septuagint is cited when referring to Elijah’s complaint that all the prophets had been slain. We read the following in the Book of Romans:

I ask, then, has God rejected his people? By no means! For I myself am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, a member of the tribe of Benjamin. God has not rejected his people whom he foreknew. Do you not know what the Scripture says of Elijah, how he appeals to God against Israel? “Lord, they have killed your prophets, they have demolished your altars, and I alone am left, and they seek my life.” But what is God’s reply to him? “I have kept for myself seven thousand men who have not bowed the knee to Baal.” (Romans 11:2-4 ESV)

Here, Paul is citing 1 Kings 19:10,14, and 18 in the Septuagint translation.

Galatians 3:8

Paul quotes the Septuagint in the passage that says Gentiles would be blessed through Abraham. He wrote the following:

And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, declared the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, “All the Gentiles shall be blessed in you.” (Galatians 3:8 NRSV)

The passage cited is Genesis 12:3. Paul cites the Greek text rather than the Hebrew text.

Galatians 4:30

The illustration that the promise of the inheritance will come through Sarah, rather than Hagar, is quoted in the Septuagint. Paul wrote:

But what does the Scripture say? “Get rid of the slave woman and her son, for the slave woman’s son will never share in the inheritance with the free woman’s son.” (Galatians 4:30 TNIV)

Here Paul is citing Genesis 21:12 in the Greek text.

1 Timothy 5:18

Paul quotes the Law of Moses in the Septuagint version. He wrote the following to Timothy:

For the scripture says, “You shall not muzzle an ox while it is treading out the grain,” and, “The laborer deserves to be paid.” (1 Timothy 5:18 NRSV)

Deuteronomy 25:4 is cited here in the Greek text.

James 2:8

James cites the Septuagint with respect to loving one’s neighbor. He wrote:

Yes indeed, it is good when you truly obey our Lord’s royal command found in the Scriptures: “Love your neighbor as yourself.” (James 2:8 NLT)

James is citing Leviticus 19:18 in the Greek translation of the Hebrew Old Testament.

James 4:6

James quotes the Septuagint concerning God blessing the humble. He said:

He gives us more and more strength to stand against such evil desires. As the Scriptures say, “God sets himself against the proud, but he shows favor to the humble.” (James 4:6 NLT)

The passage cited here is Proverbs 3:34 in the Septuagint.

Each of These References Calls What They Are Citing “Scripture”

We find the evidence convincing. On a number of occasions, the New Testament writers, in citing the Old Testament, cite the Greek text, the Septuagint, instead of citing the Hebrew text. The Septuagint is called “Scripture” in thirteen passages where it is cited.

Conclusion: the New Testament Writers Believed They Were Citing Scripture When Quoting the Greek Old Testament

Therefore, the New Testament teaches that the Septuagint, a translation, is Scripture. Since all Scripture is divinely inspired, then the Septuagint, along with other Bible translations, are divinely inspired in the sense that they convey God’s truth.

Summary – Question 31
Since All Bible Translations Are Imperfect, How Can We Speak of an Inerrant Bible?

The imperfections of Bible translations are used as an argument against an inerrant Bible. Since all translations are different, how can anyone speak of an inerrant Bible?

However the problems with translations have nothing to do with the original. It is admitted that all translations have their problems. Yet the message still comes through loud and clear. The real issue is the text behind the translations. Is it error free? The evidence says that it is.

In addition, the New Testament cites the Septuagint, a Greek translation of the Hebrew Old Testament, and calls it Scripture. Therefore, it is a biblical idea to call a translation of the Bible “Scripture.”




A blanket ban on women asking any questions during the ACM

Question: Before the ACM, a Bible-Presbyterian pastor told sisters not to ask questions during the ACM but to remain silent. If they had any...