Calvin grounded his biblical commentary work in rigorous study of Hebrew and Greek[1], making textual precision foundational to his interpretive method. His humanist training drove him toward firsthand examination of biblical and classical sources, developing his interests in philology and textual criticism—skills he demonstrated in his early commentary on Seneca by scrutinizing texts for authorial intent[2]. When addressing Scripture’s text, Calvin applied humanist methodology to scientifically determine authentic readings[3], recognizing that textual criticism represents the only viable method for establishing biblical texts[3].
Importantly, Calvin’s textual work operated within a theological framework. He employed humanistic scholarship to uncover precise word meanings and historical contexts, yet read the text discerningly rather than dismissively—never rejecting its teaching despite critical examination[4]. His acceptance of the biblical canon was not uncritical but “critically mediated,” drawing on his humanist learning to investigate the books’ history and internal characteristics[3]. This balanced approach meant he restrained his use of allegorical interpretation while allowing texts multiple senses[4].
However, Calvin worked within significant limitations. Textual criticism as a discipline had not yet emerged, requiring manuscript collections and patristic evidence that were unavailable, making Reformation-era commentaries limited in this respect[5]. While competent in Hebrew, Calvin excelled more in Greek—possibly reflecting sixteenth-century academic biases favoring Greek over Hebrew, which faced anti-Semitic resistance[1]. Yet his linguistic foundation made his work fresh and influential for his era and beyond[1], establishing a model where textual rigor and theological conviction reinforced rather than contradicted each other.
[2] Donald K. McKim, The Cambridge Companion to John Calvin, Cambridge Companions to Religion (Cambridge; New York; Melbourne; Madrid; Cape Town; Singapore; São Paulo: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 59.
[3] Bernard Ramm, “Are We Obscurantists?,” Christianity Today (Washington, D.C.: Christianity Today, 1957), 1:10:14–15.
[4] R. S. Wallace, “Calvin, John (1509–64),” in New Dictionary of Theology: Historical and Systematic, ed. Martin Davie et al. (London; Downers Grove, IL: Inter-Varsity Press; InterVarsity Press, 2016), 144.
[5] Philip Schaff and David Schley Schaff, History of the Christian Church (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1910), 8:529.
No comments:
Post a Comment