30.7.25

A conclusion and highlight the issues with KJV-only and Perfect TR

 Let’s carefully examine both the preface to the 1611 KJV and the Westminster Confession of Faith (WCF) to determine whether they support KJV-onlyism or the doctrine of a Perfect Textus Receptus (TR). We’ll then draw a conclusion and highlight the issues with KJV-only and Perfect TR proponents.


The KJV translators did not teach or support KJV-onlyism or the idea of a Perfect TR. They embraced translation as a process and valued multiple versions and manuscripts. They believed all faithful translations convey the Word of God.


The Westminster Confession affirms that God preserved His Word in the original Hebrew and Greek, not in any one printed edition or translation. It explicitly promotes the use of translations, but does not elevate the KJV or any TR edition as perfect or exclusive.


What’s wrong with KJV-Only and Perfect TR teachings?

These modern teachings misrepresent both history and theology.

🔻 a. KJV-Onlyism problems:

  • Elevates one English translation above the original languages.

  • Claims the KJV is perfect, final, and inspired, which the KJV translators explicitly denied.

  • Leads to division in the church, rejecting good modern translations like ESV, NASB, NIV.

🔻 b. Perfect TR problems:

  • The TR has multiple editions (Erasmus, Stephanus, Beza, Elzevir), and they differ in hundreds of places.

  • The KJV itself sometimes departs from all TR editions (e.g., Acts 13:33, Revelation 16:5).

  • The TR is not based on the earliest or most complete manuscripts (e.g., no early Alexandrian evidence).

🔻 c. Doctrinally flawed:

  • No Scripture teaches that God would preserve His Word in one specific printed Greek edition or in one English translation.

  • The biblical doctrine of preservation is corporate and providential, not mechanical or perfectly frozen in one version.


🧠 Final Conclusion

SourceView on KJV-onlyView on Perfect TR
KJV Preface (1611)❌ Rejected❌ Rejected
Westminster Confession (1646)❌ Rejected❌ Rejected
KJV-only/Perfect TR Proponents✅ Promote it✅ Promote it

The original KJV translators and the Westminster divines both reject the ideas of KJV-onlyism and a Perfect TR. They believed in the authority of Scripture in the original languages, the legitimacy of translation, and the continual refinement of biblical scholarship. Modern KJV-only and Perfect TR teachings are historically unfaithful, theologically misguided, and unnecessarily divisive.


 



 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Digital tool here: timeline

https://crossbible.com/timeline https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GXowCfGMCs