Oct 15, 2025

Response to KJV-Only, Perfect TR, and Verbal Plenary Preservation

Response to KJV-Only, Perfect TR, and Verbal Plenary Preservation

Proponents of KJV-Only, Perfect TR, and Verbal Plenary Preservation hold high views on the transmission and accuracy of scripture, particularly favoring the Textus Receptus (TR) underlying the KJV. While they prioritize the wording and preservation of the text, the points we derived from 1 Corinthians actually support focusing on the central message of the Gospel and unity in Christ—themes Paul consistently emphasizes over matters of sophisticated rhetoric or external scholarly approval.


1. Unity and Non-Divisiveness (1 Corinthians 1:10-11)

The strongest counter-argument from this passage against any position that leads to division is Paul's plea for unity:

"I appeal to you, brothers, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree, and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be united in the same mind and the same judgment. For it has been reported to me by Chloe’s people that there is quarreling among you..." (1 Corinthians 1:10-11, ESV)

  • The Argument: The very act of demanding one specific English translation (KJV) or Greek text-type (TR) to the exclusion of others has historically led to significant division and quarreling within the Christian church. Paul's message is that quarreling over human-derived positions (like allegiance to specific biblical scholars or translations) is inherently contradictory to the command for unity in the Lord Jesus Christ.

  • The Theological Emphasis: Paul condemns the divisiveness of saying, "I follow Paul," "I follow Apollos," or "I follow Cephas." Similarly, one could argue that saying, "I only follow the King James Version" or "I only follow the Textus Receptus," when done to the point of schism, elevates a human work (the translation or specific textual tradition) above the core unity of Christ's body.


2. Christ Crucified Over Human Wisdom (1 Corinthians 1:20 and 2:2)

Paul explicitly de-emphasizes human wisdom and knowledge in favor of the simple, potent truth of the Gospel.

  • 1 Corinthians 1:20: "Where is the one who is wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world?"

  • 1 Corinthians 2:2: "For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and him crucified."

  • The Argument: The highly technical and intricate debates surrounding Verbal Plenary Preservation (the belief that every word was perfectly preserved) and the historical lineage of the TR often rely on specialized knowledge of Greek manuscripts, textual criticism, and historical linguistics. Paul suggests that God did not intend for the Gospel's power to hinge on such technicalities.

  • The Theological Emphasis: If the saving power of the Gospel required advanced scholarly ability to discern the "perfect" manuscript line or the "perfect" English phrasing, the majority of believers—the illiterate, the poor, the non-scholarly—would be disqualified. Paul's point is that the essential message is so powerful and simple ("Christ and him crucified") that it transcends the need for human wisdom or scholarly validation. The Truth is preserved in the Person and Work of Christ, not solely in the absolute preservation of a specific version's orthography.


3. Lacking Nothing in Christ (1 Corinthians 1:5)

1 Corinthians 1:5 is often translated:

"...that in every way you were enriched in him in all speech and all knowledge..." (ESV)

  • The Argument: Paul tells the Corinthians that they were enriched in Christ with all knowledge and spiritual gifts. They didn't lack spiritual equipment. By implication, a Christian today, being "in Christ," does not lack the fundamental ability to understand the saving Gospel even if they read a modern, well-translated version of the Bible based on a different manuscript tradition.

  • The Theological Emphasis: The spiritual lack (or "poverty") that the Corinthians faced was not due to a lack of accurate information or spiritual gifts, but due to their pride and quarrelsomeness. This suggests that the spiritual condition of the reader (humility, unity, love) is more critical for engaging the truth than the technical perfection of the specific biblical text version being read.

In summary, 1 Corinthians primarily argues that unity and the simple message of the Cross must take precedence over scholarly, divisive, and overly-intellectual pursuits.



A Pastoral Response to Divisive Teachings

A Pastoral Response to Divisive Teachings

In Romans 16:17–20, the Apostle Paul writes:
“I appeal to you, brothers, to watch out for those who cause divisions and create obstacles contrary to the doctrine that you have been taught; avoid them. For such persons do not serve our Lord Christ, but their own appetites, and by smooth talk and flattery they deceive the hearts of the naive. For your obedience is known to all, so that I rejoice over you, but I want you to be wise as to what is good and innocent as to what is evil. The God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you.”

Paul’s warning is timeless. In his day, there were men and women who introduced teachings that twisted the gospel and troubled the faith of sincere believers. They sounded persuasive, but their doctrines produced pride, judgment, and division rather than humility, love, and unity in Christ.

In our time, we face similar dangers—not from pagan philosophy, but from religious absolutism dressed in pious clothing. Movements such as KJV-Onlyism, Verbal Plenary Preservation, and Perfect TR teaching often present themselves as defenders of truth. Yet in practice, many of these teachings have led to division, spiritual arrogance, and confusion among the people of God.

They turn secondary matters of Bible translation and textual history into tests of faithfulness, sometimes even claiming that only one human version of Scripture is “perfect.” In doing so, they create the very kind of obstacle Paul warned about—an obstacle “contrary to the doctrine that you have been taught,” for the doctrine of Christ calls us to unity in truth and charity in love.


What Should We Do?

Paul’s instruction is both clear and pastoral:

“Watch out for them… and avoid them.”

This does not mean we respond with anger or hostility. It means we must be discerning, refuse to be drawn into needless controversy, and guard the flock from teachings that elevate human tradition above the Word and Spirit of God.

We can do this in several ways:

  1. Stand firm in sound doctrine.
    Continue to teach the Word faithfully, using accurate and responsible translations. Affirm the inspiration and authority of Scripture without idolizing one textual form.

  2. Avoid fruitless arguments.
    Paul elsewhere warns against quarrels about words and genealogies that produce strife (2 Timothy 2:23; Titus 3:9). Do not waste energy debating those who are entrenched in divisive dogma.

  3. Protect the flock with grace and truth.
    Gently warn believers who are confused. Show them that the power of God’s Word is not limited by language or translation. The same Spirit who inspired the Word also illuminates it in every faithful rendering.

  4. Pray for the deceived and the deceivers.
    Our struggle is not against flesh and blood. Behind every false teaching is the subtle work of the enemy. But Paul reminds us, “The God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet.” We trust that the victory belongs to Christ, not to controversy.

  5. Keep the focus on Christ Himself.
    The true test of any teaching is this: does it lead us to love Jesus more deeply, to trust Him more completely, and to serve His church more humbly? Any doctrine that shifts our gaze from Christ to human pride or exclusivity must be rejected.


Closing Encouragement

So, brothers and sisters, let us heed Paul’s words with both courage and compassion.
We must stand firm against teachings that divide the body of Christ, yet remain gracious toward those who have been misled. Let us live out the truth in love, confident that God Himself will preserve His Word and His church.

And as Paul ended his exhortation, so may we say together:

“The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you.”


 

A blanket ban on women asking any questions during the ACM

Question: Before the ACM, a Bible-Presbyterian pastor told sisters not to ask questions during the ACM but to remain silent. If they had any...