The premise that the KJV is “perfect” doesn’t align with its actual history. Early editions contained misprints, spelling variations, and inconsistencies due to printing technology limitations, necessitating updates in 1629 and 1638, while the 1762 and 1769 revisions standardized the text[1].
The 1629 revision by original translators Samuel Ward and John Bois introduced over 200 changes[2], and the 1638 edition by Ward, Bois, Thomas Goad, and Joseph Mead became the standard for more than a century[2]. However, the period between 1638 and 1762 produced numerous error-ridden editions with notorious mistakes—the “Wicked Bible” omitting “not” from the seventh commandment, the “Unrighteous Bible” reversing another prohibition, and others similarly flawed[2].
In 1762, Dr. F. S. Paris updated language, spelling, grammar, punctuation, and italics while correcting many printer errors[2]. Benjamin Blayney’s 1769 revision expanded Paris’ work and became the basis for all subsequent King James Bibles, with Blayney marking 75,000 places where the text differed from the 1611 edition[2].
Regarding the NKJV, it represents a different approach entirely. The NKJV was translated by 130 scholars using a process similar to the original 1611 translation but with modern technology enabling greater accuracy and scholar communication[3]. The NKJV deliberately eliminated archaic language while preserving the KJV’s stylistic strengths[3]. Rather than claiming perfection, the NKJV acknowledges that language evolves and readability matters—principles the KJV’s own revision history demonstrates were always operative.
[1] Jessica Parks, “King James Version, 1900,” in Major English Bible Translations, Faithlife Biblical and Theological Lists (Bellingham, WA: Faithlife, 2022). [See here.]
[2] Ross H. McLaren, “Revisions of the King James Version,” in Bible Studies for Life, Fall 2011, Herschel Hobbs Commentary (LifeWay Christian Resources, n.d.), 7–8.
[3] Jessica Parks, “New King James Version,” in Major English Bible Translations, Faithlife Biblical and Theological Lists (Bellingham, WA: Faithlife, 2022). [See here, here.]
No comments:
Post a Comment