The short answer is this: 1 Corinthians 13:8 cannot mean “the completion of the New Testament” or “the end of the apostolic age” because Paul’s language, logic, and hope point far beyond history and into the final state of redemption. Once you slow down and actually listen to the text, the cessationist shortcut collapses.
Let’s walk through it calmly and honestly.
1. Paul Is Contrasting the Present Age with the Final State, Not One Church Era with Another
In 1 Corinthians 13, Paul sets up a clear contrast:
Now → Then
Partial → Complete
Knowing in part → Knowing fully
Seeing dimly → Seeing face to face
This is eschatological language. That word simply means: language about the end, the final fulfillment of God’s plan.
When Paul says in verse 12,
“Now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face,”
he is using language that, everywhere else in Scripture, refers to the direct vision of God, not the closing of a canon or the death of apostles.
No Jew in the first century—Paul included—used “face to face” to describe reading a completed book. That phrase comes from Old Testament encounters with God Himself (e.g., Moses). Paul is pointing forward to the consummation, not a publishing milestone.
2. “Knowing Fully” Cannot Describe the Post-Apostolic Church
Paul says:
“Then I shall know fully, even as I have been fully known.”
Ask the obvious question:
Has any Christian after the apostles known God as fully as God knows them?
Of course not.
Even the most learned theologians, armed with a complete New Testament, still confess partial knowledge, mystery, and limitation. The church today does not possess the kind of knowledge Paul describes here.
If “the perfect” arrived with the completed New Testament, then verse 12 would imply that ordinary believers now possess near-equal knowledge to God’s knowledge of them. That is not just wrong—it is theologically reckless.
Paul’s vision is glorification, not information.
3. The Illustration of Maturity Points to Resurrection, Not Canon Closure
Paul uses a personal analogy:
“When I was a child, I spoke like a child… when I became a man, I gave up childish ways.”
This is not a timeline of church history.
It is a contrast between this life and the life to come.
Paul consistently uses “maturity” language to describe the transition from the present fallen condition into resurrection life. The “childhood” is life under weakness, sin, and limitation. The “manhood” is life completed, restored, perfected.
Paul never uses this language anywhere else to describe the closing of revelation or the end of apostles. That idea has to be imported into the text. It does not arise from it.
4. The Context Is Love’s Permanence, Not Gifts’ Replacement by Scripture
Verse 8 begins:
“Love never ends.”
That is the controlling idea.
Spiritual gifts are temporary because they belong to the present age, where the church needs signs, knowledge, and mediated revelation. Love is permanent because it belongs to the age to come.
Paul is not saying:
“Gifts will stop when something better replaces them.”
He is saying:
“Gifts will stop when they are no longer needed.”
And when are they no longer needed?
When faith becomes sight.
When hope becomes possession.
When mediation gives way to direct presence.
A completed New Testament does not eliminate the need for faith, hope, or love. Resurrection does.
5. Paul Expected “the Perfect” to Coincide with Christ’s Return
Throughout his letters, Paul consistently locates perfection, fullness, and completion at the return of Christ, not at an earlier church milestone.
The Corinthians reading this letter would have naturally understood “the perfect” as the age to come, because that is how Jewish and early Christian theology worked. They were not thinking about a future leather-bound Bible on a shelf. That concept did not exist.
To claim Paul meant “the New Testament canon” requires assuming:
• Paul foresaw a 27-book canon
• Paul expected gifts to cease within decades
• Paul used eschatological language metaphorically for ecclesial administration
None of those assumptions are stated, implied, or supported by the text.
6. The Argument Collapses If Applied Consistently
Here is the decisive point.
If “the perfect” = completion of the New Testament, then:
• Faith should already have given way to sight
• Hope should already be fulfilled
• Knowledge should already be full
• The church should already be mature in the absolute sense Paul describes
But Paul ends the chapter by saying:
“So now faith, hope, and love abide, these three…”
Faith and hope still abide. That alone proves “the perfect” has not yet arrived.
Paul’s timeline is simple:
Now → faith, hope, love
Then → love alone
We are still in the “now.”
Final Summary
It is not possible to translate or interpret 1 Corinthians 13:8 as referring to the completion of the New Testament or the end of the apostolic age because:
• The language is eschatological, not historical
• “Face to face” points to God, not Scripture
• “Knowing fully” exceeds any post-apostolic reality
• The maturity metaphor fits resurrection, not canon formation
• Paul consistently places perfection at Christ’s return
• Faith and hope still remain, proving the “then” has not arrived
The chapter is not about when gifts stopped.
It is about why love lasts.
Paul lifts our eyes beyond church debates and reminds us that everything partial—gifts, knowledge, weakness—will one day give way to glory. Until then, we live by faith, serve in love, and wait for the day when “then” finally arrives.
No comments:
Post a Comment