The King James Version has a number of devotees who believe that it is a superiorly authentic translation in the English language, or, more broadly, that the King James Version is to be preferred over all other English translations of Scripture. I oppose this view, arguing that while the King James is an important translation in Protestant history, it is not to be elevated to such status, as new manuscript discoveries and scholarship have challenged that view.
"Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them." (Ephesians 5:11, ESV). THIS BLOG CONTAINS STRONG LANGUAGE. READER DISCRETION IS ADVICED.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
God's inspiration does not necessarily result in good results
The Theology of the Costly Call: From Zechariah to Stephen In the economy of the Kingdom of God, there exists a profound paradox that often ...
No comments:
Post a Comment