Some theologians taught their students in their Bible Colleges, once saved always saved.
This is the right doctrine of salvation.
But there is a fallacy about this doctrine.
Since they thought that they are saved with eternal security. It is not wrong to sin.
What kind of sin?
Attacking brethren in Christ. Attacking, persecuting brethren in Christ until they are frustrated, is okay because they will not lose their salvation. If they lose their salvation, they are not chosen in the beginning. They have the tendency to test and tempt people to fall away from their faith. This is the fallacy.
It is okay to fight among themselves. The division in the church is not a sin. Since we are saved, so it is not wrong to create false doctrines. They are saved once so will always be saved. It is all right to sue one another in civil court. It is all right to bear false witness to their neighbors. It is okay to attack churches, it is okay to become extremist, it is okay to become militants, it is okay to become heretics since once saved always saved.
They have this fallacy, since we are saved, it is all right to be cruel and cold blood to brethren and sisters. They are thinking that those who are saved are all strong like iron and steel, so they push the limit until some weaker brethren stumble by their cruel evil-doing and until these weaker brethren fell down. This is the fallacy of once saved always saved. They said it is not their fault, it is because those who fell away were not saved at all from the beginning. So, it is okay to create questions and doubt in those who are reading NIV. Attacking evangelical churches is okay.
These theologians are still thinking they are born-again Christians.
I am amazed by this so-called once saved always saved fallacy, in giving license to these theologians to persecute Christians.
They said those who are saved are always saved, they will stand to the end, those who fail, they are not born again, they are not been chosen by God from the beginning.
No comments:
Post a Comment