27.8.22

Heresy

 Heresy. The formal denial or doubt of any defined doctrine of the Catholic faith. In antiquity the Greek word αἵρεσις, denoting ‘choice’ or ‘thing chosen’, from which the term is derived, was applied to the tenets of particular philosophical schools. In this sense it appears occasionally in Scripture (e.g. Acts 5:17) and the early Fathers. But it was employed also in a disparaging sense (e.g. 1 Cor. 11:19) and from St *Ignatius (Trall. 6, Eph. 6) onwards it came more and more to be used of theological error. From the earliest days the Church has claimed teaching authority and consequently condemned heresy, following Christ’s command: ‘If he refuse to hear the Church, let him be unto thee as the Gentile and the publican’ (Mt. 18:17). On the other hand the need to rebut heresy has sometimes stimulated the formation of orthodox Christian doctrine.

In the early centuries heresy was mainly a matter of erroneous attempts to understand the nature of the Person of Christ (e.g. *Docetism, *Apollinarianism, *Nestorianism, *Monophysitism, *Monothelitism), of the Trinity (e.g. *Monarchianism, *Tritheism, *Subordinationism), or both (e.g. *Arianism). These heresies were condemned at the *Oecumenical Councils. After the Church had become a highly structured and incidentally wealthy institution, many of the heretical movements were inspired by a desire to return to what was seen as the simplicity of the apostolic Church. They thus had much in common with the orthodox reform movements, such as the *mendicant orders, some of whose members (esp. among the *Franciscans) were charged with heresy. Many of the heretical bodies in the Middle Ages (e.g. the *Bogomils, *Cathari, *Waldensians, the followers of *Henry of Lausanne and *Peter de Bruys) came to reject the sacraments as well as other institutions of the Church. The *Inquisition was established to secure the conversion of heretics, and punished the obdurate. With the Reformation, the establishment of Protestant state Churches ended the power of the RC Church to coerce heretics in much of Europe, though in France the hierarchy long continued to regard the *Huguenots as heretics rather than granting them the toleration promised in the Edict of *Nantes; *Calvinists in Switzerland burnt those Protestants whom they regarded as heretics.

Acc. to RC canon law, heresy is defined as the obstinate denial or doubt, after Baptism, of a truth ‘which must be believed with divine and catholic faith’ (CIC (1983), can. 751). This ‘formal’ heresy is a grave sin involving ipso facto excommunication. Catholic theology distinguishes it from what is termed ‘material heresy’. This means holding heretical doctrines through no fault of one’s own, ‘in good faith’, as is the case, e.g., with most persons brought up in heretical surroundings. It constitutes neither crime nor sin, nor is such a person strictly speaking a heretic, since, having never accepted certain doctrines, he cannot reject or doubt them. Heresy is to be distinguished from *apostasy and *schism (qq.v.). See also BURNING, DE HEARTICO COMBURENDO and individual heresies.


W. Bauer, Rechtgläubigkeit und Ketzerei im ältesten Christentum (Beiträge zur historischen Theologie, 10; 1934; 2nd edn. by G. Strecker, 1964; Eng. tr., Philadelphia, 1971; London, 1972). M. Simon, ‘From Greek Hairesis to Christian Heresy’, in W. R. Schoedel and R. L. Wilken (eds.), Early Christian Literature and the Classical Intellectual Tradition in Honorem Robert M. Grant (Théologie Historique, 53 [1979]), pp. 101–16. A. Le Boulluec, La notion d’hérésie dans la Littérature grecque, IIe–IIIe siécles (2 vols., Études Augustiniennes, 1985).

W. L. Wakefield and A. P. Evans, Heresies of the High Middle Ages: Selected Sources Translated and Annotated (Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies, 81; 1969). [J. J.] I. von *Döllinger, Beiträge zur Sektengeschichte des Mittelalters (2 vols., Munich, 1890). G. [A.] Leff, Heresy in the Later Middle Ages: The Relation of Heterodoxy to Dissent c.1250–c.1450 (2 vols., Manchester and New York, 1967). J. Le Goff (ed.), Hérésies et sociétés dans l’Europe pré-industrielle 11e–18e siècles: Colloque de Royaumont, 27–30 Mai 1962 (Civilisations et sociétés, 10; 1968), with bibl. of post-1900 studies on medieval heresies, pp. 407–67. N. G. Garsoïn, ‘Byzantine Heresy. A Reinterpretation’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 25 (1971), pp. 85–113. W. Lourdaux and D. Verhelst (eds.), The Concept of Heresy in the Middle Ages (11th–13th C.): Proceedings of the International Conference, Louvain May 13–16, 1973 (Mediaevalia Lovaniensia, 1st ser., vol. 4; 1976). M. D. Lambert, Medieval Heresy: Popular Movements from Bogomil to Hus (1977; 3rd edn., Oxford, 2002). G. G. Merlo, Eretici e Inquisitori nella Società Piemontese del Trecento (Turin [1977]). R. Kieckhefer, Repression of Heresy in Medieval Germany (Philadelphia and Liverpool, 1979). Y. Stoyanov, The Hidden Tradition in Europe: The secret history of medieval Christian heresy (1994; rev. edn., The Other God: Dualist Religions from Antiquity to the Cathar Heresy, New Haven and London, 2000).

H. Schlier in TWNT 1 (1933), pp. 179–84 (Eng. tr., 1 (1964), pp. 180–5), s.v. αἱρέομαι. A. Michel in DTC 6 (1920), cols. 2208–57, s.v. ‘Hérésie, Hérétique’; A. Patschovsky in Lexikon des Mittelalters, 4 (1989), cols. 1933–7, s.v. ‘Häresie’. See also works cited under CATHARI and other heresies mentioned in the text.



F. L. Cross and Elizabeth A. Livingstone, eds., The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (Oxford;  New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), 762–763.

HERESY

 HERESY Opinion or doctrine not in line with the accepted teaching of a church; the opposite of orthodoxy. Our English word is derived from a Greek word that has the basic idea of “choice.” In ancient classical Greek it was used predominantly to refer to the philosophical school to which one chose to belong. Later, it came to be associated with the teaching of philosophical schools.

The word had a similar usage in Jewish writings. Josephus, a Jewish historian of the first century from whom we learn much of what we know about the Judaism of NT times, used the word to refer to the various Jewish parties (or schools of thought) such as the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Essenes. Jewish rabbis employed the term in a bad sense applying it to groups who had separated from the main stream of Jewish teaching.

The word has several usages in the NT but never has the technical sense of “heresy” as we understand it today. It may be classified as follows:

(1) Most frequently, especially in Acts, it has the same meaning as Josephus. In Acts 5:17; 15:5; and 26:5, where it refers to the Pharisees and Sadducees, it simply means party or sect.

(2) In Acts 24:14 and 28:22 it is used in a slightly derogatory sense, referring to Christians as they were viewed to be separatists or sectarians by the Jews. This usage conforms to that of the rabbis.

(3) Paul used the term to refer to groups that threatened the harmonious relations of the church. In 1 Cor. 11:19, where he was writing about the disgraceful way in which the Corinthians were observing the Lord’s Supper, the word has to do with the outward manifestations of the factions he mentioned in verse 18. In Gal. 5:20 it is one of the works of the flesh and is in a grouping including strife, seditions, and envyings. It apparently has to do with people who choose to place their own desires above the fellowship of the church. Titus 3:10 speaks of a man who is a heretic. Since the context of the verse has to do with quarreling and dissension, the idea in this passage seems to be that of a fractious person.

(4) In 2 Pet. 2:1 it comes closest to our meaning of the term. It clearly refers to false prophets who have denied the true teaching about Christ. Since the remainder of 2 Pet. 2 refers to the immoral living of the false prophets, the word also refers to their decadent living. The reference to the heretic in Titus 3:10 may belong to this category since the verse mentions disputes about genealogies, a doctrinal matter.

It is clear that in the NT, the concept of heresy had more to do with fellowship within the church than with doctrinal teachings. While the writers of the NT were certainly concerned about false teachings, they apparently were just as disturbed by improper attitudes.

In the writings of Ignatius, a leader of the church in the early second century, the word takes on the technical meaning of a heresy. Most frequently in the writings of the early church fathers, the heresy about which they were concerned was Gnosticism, a teaching which denied that Jesus was fully human. See Christ, Christology; Gnosticism.

W. T. Edwards, Jr.



W. T. Edwards Jr., “Heresy,” ed. Chad Brand et al., Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary (Nashville, TN: Holman Bible Publishers, 2003), 751.

Heresy

 Heresyfrom a Greek word signifying (1) a choice, (2) the opinion chosen, and (3) the sect holding the opinion. In the Acts of the Apostles (5:17; 15:5; 24:5, 14; 26:5) it denotes a sect, without reference to its character. Elsewhere, however, in the New Testament it has a different meaning attached to it. Paul ranks “heresies” with crimes and seditions (Gal. 5:20). This word also denotes divisions or schisms in the church (1 Cor. 11:19). In Titus 3:10 a “heretical person” is one who follows his own self-willed “questions,” and who is to be avoided. Heresies thus came to signify self-chosen doctrines not emanating from God (2 Pet. 2:1).[1]

19.8.22

I believe the autograph is the Word of God

I believe in the Name of the Triune God: Father, Son and Holy Spirit that I believe "the autograph and original Bible in Hebrew and Greek is none other than the voice of Him that sitteth upon the throne. Every book of it, every chapter of it, every verse of it, every word of it, every syllable of it, every letter of it, is direct utterance of the Most High. The Bible is none other than the Word of God, not some part of it more, some part of it less, but all alike the utterance of Him that sitteth upon the throne, faultless, unerring, supreme." So help me God, AMEN.

 

2.8.22

Center Church: Doing Balanced, Gospel-Centered Ministry in Your City

Practical and Gospel-centered thoughts on how to have a fruitful ministry by one of America's leading and most beloved pastors.

Many church leaders are struggling to adapt to a culture that values individuality above loyalty to a group or institution. There have been so many "church growth" and "effective ministry" books in the past few decades that it's hard to know where to start or which ones will provide useful and honest insight.

Based on over twenty years of ministry in New York City, Timothy Keller takes a unique approach that measures a ministry's success neither by numbers nor purely by the faithfulness of its leaders, but on the biblical grounds of fruitfulness.

Center Church outlines a balanced theological vision for ministry organized around three core commitments:

  • Gospel-centered: The gospel of grace in Jesus Christ changes everything, from our hearts to our community to the world. It completely reshapes the content, tone, and strategy of all that we do.
  • City-centered: With a positive approach toward our culture, we learn to affirm that cities are wonderful, strategic, and under-served places for gospel ministry.
  • Movement-centered: Instead of building our own tribe, we seek the prosperity and peace of our community as we are led by the Holy Spirit.

 

"Between a pastor's doctrinal beliefs and ministry practices should be a well-conceived vision for how to bring the gospel to bear on the particular cultural setting and historical moment. This is something more practical than just doctrine but much more theological than "how-to steps" for carrying out a ministry. Once this vision is in place, it leads church leaders to make good decisions on how to worship, disciple, evangelize, serve, and engage culture in their field of ministry—whether in a city, suburb, or small town." — Tim Keller, Core Church

1.8.22

Letter to Jeffrey Kh00, Quek Suaan Yew and Prabudass:

You should be admonishing and rebuking your brother and sister, not facilitating false prophets and teachers. But sadly you yourself have become one of the false prophets and teachers. Teaching false doctrines. Those who won’t assent to God’s word should resign from God’s Church!

I hope you repent, better still, for you to stand up for the Bible and God’s word, by uniting with brethren in other Bible Presbyterian Churches in Singapore.

You have chosen to submit to your own imagination over the Bible version, you reject NIV, ESV, LEB, ... You’ve chosen the World over the witness. You dishonored God in your approach to these matters. It is not too late to stop this but the choice is yours.

Please remember that most people in the pews share my position, I pray that you may change your doctrine of the Bible. Please accept NIV, ESV, LEB, ...

By a laughing stock

30.7.22

Cursing the false teachers

 I declared a curse upon anyone who preached a message different from the Bible. (Gal 1:8–9).

 

26.7.22

I wished that those who taught false teachings would burn themselves

 I wished that those who taught that Christians must only read the "King James Bible (KJV)" would “burn that KJV together with Textus Receptus (TR) into ashes and drink those ashes with 100% purified water.” I wish those who unsettle you would burn themselves!

23.7.22

Ads

Luke 4:18-19

Jesus likely read from the Hebrew Bible: Most scholars agree that Jesus, being Jewish, would have read from the Hebrew Bible, which at that ...